Posted at 11:38 AM in Bill LaFayette, Ph.D, Doing Business in Columbus, Economic Data | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted at 08:42 AM in Bill LaFayette, Ph.D, Economic Data | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted at 09:30 AM in Bill LaFayette, Ph.D, Business Trends, Economic Data | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Check out Walker's interview with Bill on the Columbus Underground:
An excerpt from the interview is included below:
We recently sat down with Dr. Bill LaFayette, Ph.D., the Vice President of
Economic Analysis at the Columbus Chamber of Commerce, to discuss a
variety of topics related to the Columbus economy.
Bill shares with us his professional insight and research on some of
the most important job sectors in the region, the growing importance of
the creative class and urban renewal, and his thoughts on how Columbus
is weathering the current economic recession. The full interview on the Columbus economy can be found here.
For more insights on the Columbus MSA economy, read Bill's series of posts here.
Posted at 11:37 AM in Bill LaFayette, Ph.D, Doing Business in Columbus, Economic Data | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The Columbus Dispatch reported Thursday that Ohio foreclosures have declined for three consecutive months while they continue to rise nationally. The experts are not sure whether this is a real turn in the trend or just a temporary break in a downward trend. While foreclosures are likely to continue to be a serious problem for Ohio communities and neighborhoods, there are reasons to think that the situation in other states will be worse.
The foreclosure crisis in Ohio has been driven by different factors than is true elsewhere. Nationwide there was a large run-up in house prices followed by a crash. Between the first quarter of 2002 and the second quarter of 2007 (when the market peaked), national house prices rose 47 percent, compared to 14 percent in Ohio and 15.5 percent in the Columbus MSA, according to the federal government’s FHFA House Price Index. Since then, national prices have fallen 3.8 percent, while Ohio prices are off 0.1 percent and those in the Columbus MSA have recovered and are up 0.7 percent. (Only 10 of the 50 largest metros have done better.) California, Florida, Arizona and Nevada account for 56 percent of foreclosure filings. The 2002-2007 house price gain in these four states was more than 90 percent, and their subsequent loss has been between 18 and 27 percent. Many of those buying in these states near the top of the market now owe far more than the house is worth. If the payment on the mortgage increases to an unaffordable level, they cannot refinance and have no alternative but to default.
Homeowners in these four states share the chief problem facing Ohio’s homeowners: payment problems due to job loss. Ohio employment has declined 5.9 percent since the beginning of the recession – equal to California’s loss, but less than the 7.2 percent in Florida, the 7.8 percent in Nevada, and the 9 percent in Arizona. The rate of job declines is expected to decrease in coming months, but the recovery in the housing market in boom states is likely to be much longer in coming.
Posted at 09:06 AM in Bill LaFayette, Ph.D, Economic Data | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The Bureau of Labor Statistics released preliminary June employment statistics for the Columbus MSA this morning. On a seasonally-adjusted basis, total employment increased in the Columbus Region for the second consecutive month. This is especially surprising because the June decline in U.S. employment was worse than that in May. Our net gain was 1,700 jobs (0.2 percent), close to the 2,000-job gain in May. (May employment was adjusted downward by 300 jobs.) The nation lost 459,000 jobs (0.35 percent), compared to 330,000 jobs (0.25 percent) in May. State employment fell 33,000 (0.6 percent). Since the recession began in December 2007, the region has lost 17,600 jobs, or 2.0 percent, compared to losses of 4.7 percent nationally and 5.9 percent in Ohio. The largest employment gains in June were 2,500 in private education and healthcare and 1,200 in the beleaguered government sector. Construction lost 1,400 and leisure and hospitality lost 1,200. Changes in everything else were close to zero.
For more information on the Columbus economy, visit www.columbusregion.com.
Posted at 02:03 PM in Bill LaFayette, Ph.D, Economic Data, Workforce information | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I was honored to be guest speaker Wednesday at a Pickaway County Chamber event. Part of my talk included some analysis of the Pickaway County economy. I always enjoy these deeper dives into local economies because of the significant economic differences among the eight counties of our region. Pickaway County’s economy is driven by manufacturing. The 2,450 manufacturing jobs in 2007 represented almost 17 percent of the county’s total employment – a concentration 63 percent greater than the U.S. and twice that of the Columbus region as a whole. As is true of other manufacturing-oriented areas, efficiency increases and consolidation among producers caused employment declines for Pickaway County earlier in the decade. Manufacturing lost more than 2,000 jobs (46.5 percent) between 2001 and 2006, which led to a total loss of nearly 1,900 jobs (11.6 percent) over that period. Unlike most other manufacturing-based economies, though, Pickaway County has enjoyed strong growth more recently. The county gained 100 manufacturing jobs (4.2 percent) between 2006 and 2007, and about 40 more in the first three quarters of 2008. As a result, Pickaway County’s total employment increased 2.7 percent in 2007 – twice the rate of the Columbus region and the U.S. – and declined only marginally in the first three quarters of 2008 relative to the same period of 2007. The earlier employment declines and current recession, however, have led to a May 2009 seasonally-adjusted unemployment rate of 11.3 percent.
State government is also important, contributing more than 10 percent of employment. There are two sectors that, while still below average in terms of employment share, are growing nicely and becoming far more important: professional and business services and private education and healthcare. Transportation and logistics has declined since 2001, but has a bright future thanks to the recent opening of the Norfolk Southern Intermodal on the county’s northern border, and the completion of the Heartland Corridor rail project next year.
Posted at 01:57 PM in Bill LaFayette, Ph.D, Business Trends | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
We now have preliminary Columbus MSA employment numbers for May and they are surprisingly good. On a seasonally-adjusted basis, jobs in the region increased 2,300 (0.25 percent) from April. The national job total decreased by exactly the same 0.25 percent, but this was the smallest national job decline since last September. The largest local gains were registered by professional and business services, which has been a little soft lately but gained 2,300 jobs in May, and private education and healthcare (up 1,600). Government and manufacturing lost 800 jobs each and retail lost 700. Other sectors showed modest changes up or down of 100 to 300 jobs each. Since the recession began, the local area has lost 19,000 jobs (2.0 percent), much less than the national loss of 4.3 percent and Ohio’s 5.3 percent.
The May regional unemployment rate was a seasonally-adjusted 8.5 percent, nearly a percentage point lower than the U.S. rate of 9.4 percent. These two rates were essentially equal in January. The Ohio rate, meanwhile, was 10.8 percent.
Before we get too excited, it is important to remember that these employment totals are preliminary and will be revised next month. But it is clear that the Columbus region continues to fare far better than elsewhere in this recession.
Posted at 10:39 AM in Bill LaFayette, Ph.D, Doing Business in Columbus | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Today the Bureau of Labor Statistics released initial estimates of U.S. employment and unemployment for May (actually the second week in May). As usual, the headlines are focusing on a single number, the unemployment rate, which rose to 9.4 percent from 8.9 percent in April. This is a very easy number to communicate and fits well into a headline. But for a couple of reasons, the unemployment rate is not the best gauge of the status of the economy, either nationally or locally.
For one thing, changes in the unemployment rate are driven both by changes in employment and changes in the labor force – equivalently, the number of people working and the number of people looking for work. This latter number is defined in a very specific way: you are looking for work – and in the labor force – if you have actively sought employment within the last 30 days. If you have not, you are not counted at all. (These totals are estimated from a monthly survey of households called the Current Population Survey.) In reality, being available for work is not a yes-no question; it is a more-or-less question. For this reason, the labor force fluctuates from month to month as people who do not work steadily step up or step down their job search. This can cause some odd results. In April, the number of people looking for work jumped, leading to the largest monthly percentage increase in the labor force since November 2007. This caused a fairly big increase in the unemployment rate (8.5 percent to 8.9 percent) even though the estimated number of people working actually increased slightly. In May, the number of people fell back somewhat while the labor force increased again, producing the unemployment rate increase to 9.4 percent.
Just the opposite can happen as well. The initial estimates for the Columbus region during mid-2003, as the labor market was bottoming out after the last recession, showed employment and labor force both declining. But because the labor force was falling faster than employment, the unemployment rate was declining. People were asking me, “The unemployment rate is falling at last. Isn’t this great?” My reply was, “Well, no.” Actually, this is the worst of all possible worlds: jobs were declining and workers were expecting not to find work, so they were not even looking. Conversely, the increases in labor force we have seen during the past three months are a sign that workers may be expecting jobs to be easier to come by during the summer. Thus, the unemployment rate increases aren’t quite as bad as they seem.
That leads to the second problem with the unemployment rate: it understates the pain as the economy worsens. As jobs disappear, people stop looking for them, which puts downward pressure on labor force and the unemployment rate. Thus, the unemployment rate increases less in a recession than it would if the number of discouraged workers weren’t increasing. If people hadn’t dropped out of the labor force over the course of the current recession, the May unemployment rate would have been an even 10 percent.
A much better labor market indicator is the total number of jobs (nonfarm payroll employment). This declined in May by “only” 345,000 – half the 700,000-job pace between December and March and the smallest decline since last September. It is hard to imagine the disappearance of 345,000 jobs being good news, but that is a sign of the current times.
We will get local payroll employment estimates for May in two weeks, but thus far we are weathering the recession fairly well. From the beginning of the recession through April, U.S. employment fell 4.2 percent, while Columbus region employment fell 2.1 percent – again, good news only in context.
Posted at 01:35 PM in Bill LaFayette, Ph.D, Workforce information | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The Columbus MSA continued its better-than-average employment performance during the first quarter. Although preliminary March statistics show that the region lost 4,600 jobs during the first three months of 2009, the 0.5 percent loss was less than one-third the 1.6 percent U.S. decline. Employment growth in most individual sectors was also stronger than average. The worrisome decline in transportation – a crucial sector for us – paused, with a net gain of 500 jobs (1.0 percent) . Most other individual sectors turned in better-than-average performance, including retail, financial activities, and professional and business services, each of which registered small net gains locally while continuing to decline nationally. Since the beginning of the recession in December 2007, the Columbus MSA’s job loss has been 1.9 percent – little more than half the 3.7 percent national average. Read the full quarterly economic update here.
Posted at 01:36 PM in Bill LaFayette, Ph.D, Business Trends | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Recent Comments